Exclusive: How did Rosalind Franklin miss the helix in her iconic DNA image? She didn’t
New analysis refutes James Watson’s claim he was first to recognize significance of famed photograph 51
ByTim Appenzeller
Exclusive: How did Rosalind Franklin miss the helix in her iconic DNA image? She didn’t
New analysis refutes James Watson’s claim he was first to recognize significance of famed photograph 51
ByTim Appenzeller
Comments (5)
Sign in to comment
@gutenberg_org Wait...would... shelix go over well?..
@gutenberg_org "Camera" should not be in quotes here. The word only means 'room', and by analogy 'box' or 'container'. (Law uses the phrase 'in camera' for "in the room".) Early photographic cameras really were just small containers, and you can still make and use those. They're not LIKE cameras; they ARE cameras. Putting this in quotes here is like calling a chariot a "vehicle". A chariot is an old-fashioned kind of vehicle, but it's a vehicle as much as your car is.
@gutenberg_org
A very good read. Thank you for posting here.
@grb090423 you’re very welcome!
@Paul_Taylor certainly not, thanks for sharing. And perhaps Nobel’s could be changed even if I really doubt that it would happen