Skip to main content

The Supreme Court just sent a clear message: ISPs are NOT copyright police.…

The Supreme Court just sent a clear message: ISPs are NOT copyright police. That’s a win for internet access, online speech, and creativity. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/03/supreme-court-agrees-eff-isps-dont-have-be-copyright-enforcers

Preview image for Supreme Court Agrees With EFF: ISPs Don't Have To Be Copyright Enforcers

Supreme Court Agrees With EFF: ISPs Don't Have To Be Copyright Enforcers

If your ISP can be liable for huge amounts of money for not terminating your access to the internet because of accusations that you—or someone in your household or college network—has committed copyright infringement, that is dangerous. We live in a world where high speed internet access is a...

www.eff.org
View original 0 Likes 0 Boosts

Comments (2)

@eff Now is an excellent time for everyone to discover internet piracy--don't pay a billion dollar corporation for your entertainment.

They have enough money. They have TOO MUCH money, and the artists have usually already been paid (a comparatively tiny amount) by the time their works hit subscription services.

Pay small artists; steal from big corporations. It's right and good. Small artists will get some cash, and the corporations (for better or worse) will still be outrageously wealthy.

@eff thats not only incorrect, but it's against the entire legal protocol ISPs get licensing to be an internet service provision company with.

Congratulations, everyone is now far more misinformed about reality with direct intention thanks to your spreading lies about the legalities surrounding getting a license to provide internet service in the united states of America, AT ALL.

ISPs are legally obligated to freeze the accounts of known pirating.

Or they get fined. A shit ton.